PDA

View Full Version : What do you think of all this?



1marineslady
May 7th, 2006, 02:40
Love him or loathe him, he nailed this one right on the head..........

By Rush Limbaugh:

I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of the
September 11 casualty and those who die serving our country in Uniform
are
profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you just
don't
criticize anything having to do with September 11. Well, I can't let
the
numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the
entitlement mentality of this country. If you lost a family member in
the
September 11 attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The
range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7
million.


If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed in
action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half
of
which is taxable.

Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse,
yo u get $833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211
per
month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments
come
to a screeching halt.

Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of
$1.185
million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. Their
deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place
at
the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and
they and their families know the dangers.

We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from
theOklahoma
Citybombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that
the
September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the
families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for
compensation
as well.

You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel
of
over 50 years of entitlement polit ics in this country. It's just really
sad. Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they usually
receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat
in
theMiddle Eastwhile their families have to survive on food stamps and
live
in low-rent housing. Make sense?

However, our own U.S. Congress voted themselves a raise. Many of you
don't
know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a
pension
that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being
millionaires plus. They do not receive Social Security on retirement
because they didn't have to pay into the system.

If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an
E-7,
they may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who
placed them in harm's way receives a pension of $15,000 per month.

I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks
before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons
and
daughters who are now fighting.

"When do we finally do something about this?"

CplCJ
May 8th, 2006, 06:19
Even though Rush is annoying at times, he is an intelligent man.

innersanctum
May 8th, 2006, 06:59
Yeah, he is so intelligent.

Limbaugh in 1995:


“The laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods, which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.” […]


“What this says to me is that too many whites are getting away with drug use, too many whites are getting away with drug sales, too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."


In 2006:
Mr. Limbaugh's lawyer, Roy Black, said his client and prosecutors in Palm Beach County had reached a settlement in which Mr. Limbaugh would be charged with a single count in connection with allegations that he illegally obtained multiple prescriptions for a drug from more than one doctor.


As part of the agreement, which Mr. Black said would be filed with the court on Monday, the charge would be dropped in 18 months if Mr. Limbaugh continued to undergo treatment for drug addiction.

Yeah, Intelligent....whatever!

Maybe a hypocrate is more appropriate or deceitful...but intelligent? He panders to his fans on almost every level.

MadMax
May 8th, 2006, 09:03
He said the first comments while under the influence, Steve. But you also understand that you researched back ten years to discover a statement contrary to recent events. That will always happen if half of your life is spent being recorded. If only our politicians could boast such low odds of contradiction.

innersanctum
May 8th, 2006, 09:22
Yes, but that is the way of the life of a public official. It's still called pandering...

So do you think he feels differently now that he has been caught and will do no time and even better, that his record is going to be expunged after 18 months if he stays clean or do you think his soft sensitive side has shown through now and he feels that drug addicts don't really deserve to be "sent up" like other criminals for their crimes.

Fact is, he was caught in a Republican state with a Republican governor (who happens to be the Republican President's brother) and is getting off without being "sent up" as he said himself all drug addicts should be. I suppose in that respect, he must be somewhat intelligent.

Afterall, in September 2003 (only 3 years ago this time) he did say:

"I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn't deserve. The defense carried this team."

Racist undertone aside, he didn't know anything about this football team and was commenting on the team which he once again obviously didn't know anything about. I follow football and would have not been as bold to make that same statement myself. So is the life a man that makes his living in politics whether it be about talking them or otherwise.

As for his other comments, I am getting way off the original topic so let me lasso myself back in.

From Snopes.com

What this piece doesn't mention is that military personnel are automatically insured (unless they decline the coverage) under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI (http://www.insurance.va.gov/sgliSite/SGLI/sgli%20faq.htm#3)) program, which pays a maximum of $250,000 to the families of servicemen killed while on active service — the same as the base amount paid to the families of civilians killed in the September 11 terrorist attacks through the Victim Compensation Fund. However, the SGLI program is insurance for which servicemen have to pay premiums ($20 per month), its compensation doesn't begin to compare with the average of $1.65 million that will be paid to the families of September 11 victims, and many of the civilians killed in the terrorist attacks already had their own life insurance coverage.

In any case, this measuring of different compensation amounts is a bit like the proverbial comparison between apples and oranges. Those who sign up for the armed services voluntarily choose that profession knowing full well that they may be called upon to give their lives for their country; civilians do not. Policemen, firefighters, Secret Service agents, and others also choose careers that often require them to undertake dangerous assignments in order to protect the public safety, but they aren't comparatively well-paid either. However unfair it may seem, these professionals know when they sign up that large salaries and compensation aren't part of the bargain.

This piece is also circulating with a coda that looks like it was tacked on by someone else, possibly as a commentary on the article that has now mistakenly been assumed a part of the original article itself: "Patriotism is not a short and frenzied outburst of emotion but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime." — Adlai E. Stevenson, Jr.

Every time when a pay raise comes up for the military they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low rent housing. However our own U.S. Congress just voted themselves a raise, and many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one-time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month and most are now equal to be millionaires plus. They also do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system.

If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7 you may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed you in harms way receive a pension of $15,000 per month. I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting.
The claim that Congressmen can receive lavish pensions after serving only a single term in Congress (eventually totalling into the millions of dollars) and that they neither pay into nor receive benefits from the Social Security fund is misinformation already covered on a separate page (http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/pensions.asp) of this site. (As of 1998, the average annuity for retired members of Congress was about $48,000.)

MadMax
May 8th, 2006, 09:34
Yes, getting back on track... I have read this a few times, and even something else concerning medical benefits, and it all makes me sick to my stomach.

CplCJ
May 8th, 2006, 10:59
My "intelligent" comment was supposed to be in green, I forgot to change the color.